”
matter?
nothing is perfect. Just like sugar, it is originally a good thing, but I never thought that people could have problems eating sugar so quickly when they have plenty of materials. The same goes for sugar substitutes.
is the result of scientific development and progress to a certain extent before it was born. The beginning of its birth announced that the sweet curse of sugar can be lifted. In the future, scientists in the field of sweeteners will strive to explore more possibilities for people in addition to traditional sweet substances such as sucrose and fructose in the dimensions of safety, taste, sweetness, energy and price.
I’m quite satisfied with that.
may vary greatly depending on whether a site in a structural formula is electron donating methyl ethyl or methoxy, electron absorbing nitro, left-handed or right-handed. Whether a certain sugar substitute has safety risk or not requires long-term control variables and targeted research on a specific structural formula of
.
one insecurity negates the whole field, which is misleading and has no scientific basis.
this kind of behavior I would like to call abandoning food for choking, cutting feet to fit shoes, throwing children with bath water, and opening eyes with a chainsaw for constipation.
penicillin was born. In the future, some people may have the problem of antibiotic resistance, but this is the problem of people abusing tools, not the tool itself. It does not mean that human beings should re rely on immunity to fight with germs. Sugar substitutes are the same. It’s a matter of degree.
gives the source of quotation, but it is a statistical content, that is to have fun. I’m a man who has written statistical jokes. Statistics is one of the most open fraud disciplines in the world. As long as you don’t want to be shameful, the data is shameless and the measurement standard is subjective, you can get any conclusion.
take a classic study of 100000 people in France to prove that sugar substitutes or increase the risk of cancer, so as to conclude that sugar substitutes are not safe.
let me help you find the original text.
study obtained the gender, age, education level, medical history, diet, lifestyle, health data and other data of these people. It was found that there were 3358 new cancer cases among these people, and the average age of onset at the time of diagnosis was 59.5 ± 12.2 years, which proved that sugar substitutes or increasing cancer risk.
why did I say “have fun”? Brother
, not to mention that the experimental control does not control variables, consider other factors.
if you look at the age of onset at the age of 60 years younger, even if you don’t drink anything, he is also in a high incidence of cancer. If you don’t believe it, ask those who sell insurance around you. Do you still sell their serious illness insurance at this age?
this age is a group that can make insurance companies unwilling to take premium. Guess whether insurance companies are stupid or not?
if you follow this algorithm, when you get sick at this age, their neighbor’s dog will give birth, which will also lead to a high incidence of cancer.
he also has a high incidence of cancer by eating Ollie.
he turns upside down in the toilet at 3 a.m. and eats eggs and cakes, which will also lead to a high incidence of cancer.
even let me give you another example.
for example, in a controlled trial, 1000 people who drink hand ground coffee every day and 1000 people who don’t drink coffee are found to be healthier after follow-up research.
can you prove that hand grinding coffee is good for your health?
no, have you ever considered that the former may be richer than the latter. His material conditions are here. He can afford to drink coffee every day. He just lives a good life, so it is easy to be healthier than the latter?
is this an atypical attribution fallacy?
it is obvious that what makes him healthy is not coffee, but money.
so really, statistics is really a dress up thing.
the same problem of information gap occurred repeatedly in my research. I found that many papers were inconclusive, and many people directly helped researchers to sentence sugar substitutes to death.
paper means that it may not be safe and requires large-scale investigation and research.
it is not difficult to find “possibility” in scientific research. It is very difficult to prove “ability” in one stroke, because scientific research is very rigorous.
sugar substitute is not an absolute safe choice. I know that I have read a lot of papers on the problem of sugar substitute, but it is wrong to directly sum up that it is unsafe.
this scientist needs to study for several years and decades. We can’t just open our mouth.
, I’m really stupid. First of all, is the sugar free beverage you drink a non sweet beverage, a sugar substitute beverage or a sugar free beverage? You drink a product without sucrose but with lactose, and you get fat. Is it sugar or a sugar substitute pot? You have a big appetite and eat half a pot of rice. Does sugar substitute make you fat or carbon water make you fat? Sugar substitutes are not absolutely safe, but I’m a little confused because sugar made a sin and shot sugar substitutes.
around the mainstream point of view, I checked some literature and took the commonly used sucralose as an example.
is not only sucralose, but also other 39 additives.
in addition, anything, regardless of dose, is playing a rogue. Drinking too much water can directly kill you. I even want to laugh when I calculate the dose.
still take the above paper. If I were a male weighing 80 kg and the content of sucralose in every 100ml sugar free cola was 17mg, even if the results of the mouse experiment were applicable to me, I only needed to drink 1882 bottles of sugar free Cola every day, and there would be a problem with DNA. Brother
, I can drink nearly a ton of water every day, and the lung leaves can drink and float. Will I care if there is a problem with sugar substitutes? I first consider the issue of gene lock. I have to push my glasses and sigh with the wisdom of mortals.
regardless of an absurd conclusion and a pile of arguments that cannot be hammered, how to create the conclusion that sugar substitutes are unsafe; Do you want to suggest to me that drinking sugar substitutes is false self-discipline. Fart is useless. If you want to drink sweet, you still have to drink sugary drinks.
elder brother, I really want to be pure for health, so I only drink boiled water; If I become a slave to sugary drinks again because of this idea, it is because my feet are itchy and I suspect that I have beriberi, so I can amputate my limbs directly?
scientists are bald, just to let you rest assured that you eat sweet, do you deserve other people’s hair? There are many papers on the problem of
sugar substitute. But there are more papers on sugar problems. Not to mention the repetition of academic words, but judging from the amount of literature, sugary drinks are really enough to go to hell. Good guy, Satan has to have the name of sugar drink tattooed on his back.
slide down to see
sugar substitutes have risks that need to be studied, and they also score different ingredients. It is a conclusion that sugar has risks. Who threw oli on the former’s pants?
the World Health Organization is pressing its head and calling for reducing sugar intake to less than 25g a day. Children under the age of three should not eat free sugar.
but big brother, if you the sugar content of this bottle of carbonated beverage with sugar, you can directly dry out the sugar intake of people for a day or two.
the sugar content of other fruit juices and yogurt can be so high that mom doesn’t know it.
sugar substitutes may not be safe.
but these drinks, fruit juice and other sugary drinks, are they special? It’s really terrible.
together with these manufacturers selling sugar drinks, whose nationality is in the United Nations?
, it’s boring.
as for the unhealthy thing of eating too much sugar, sugar beverage manufacturers and capital know better than anyone. How can you pretend to be stupid when you add sugar? It’s not about your job, my health is not important; It’s about your job. I rely on sugar substitutes to self-discipline or paralyze myself, but I don’t cherish myself?
looking down, I also found some interesting information about the black history of the American Sugar Association. For example, how did they sponsor some scientific research to dilute the impact of sugar on the risk of coronary heart disease. Then wronged on the fat head.
use money to open the way and dilute the research that sugar increases the risk of heart disease and stroke.
but I really want to say one thing.
sugar substitute is not a good thing, but sugar has to go to hell.
to be healthy, I only drink water and I don’t touch either.
I’m reduced to drinking sugar substitutes. You also told me that sugar substitutes are bad. Please get out of my life.
ordinary food doesn’t have to say zero card. Sugar substitute drinks are naked and dare to directly mark 0 card in the nutritional composition table. You can’t say that people don’t understand the advertising law?
but the reason why it can be washed up on a large scale is that it is robbing for a job with sugar drinks.
although almost all sugar beverage manufacturers have sugar free product lines, the cost of mastering the supply chain of high-quality sugar substitutes is too high.
I find it more interesting to check the industry data next.
this is the change trend of sweetener use in domestic sugar substitutes in recent years.
yes, erythritol.
let’s start with this thing. Is it safe?
is a sugar alcohol, which has the risk of diarrhea, but it is already one of the safest sweeteners.
is not a new thing. It is the product of enzyme fermentation. Coincidentally, there is no enzyme related to metabolism in the human body. After it enters the body, it cannot be fermented and used, and finally it is excreted with urine.
can be said to take the high-speed forward and backward without stopping at all.
there are still two documents here. It is also harmless to teeth.
is expensive.
is 0.6-0.7 times sweeter than sucrose. Five yuan sucrose can produce sweetness. It costs 23 yuan, not to mention fructose syrup. The cost gap of
is five times faster. How can it compare with sucrose?
not to mention how to compare with aspartame, which is often ten million times sweeter than sucrose and has a very high sweet price ratio?
aspartame is a low-cost sweetener, and sugar beverage manufacturers like it because it’s really cheap.
look at the current 0-card beverage formula table. It’s very clear.
in the past, sugary drinks had the right to define sweetness, but now the right to define sweetness is changing.
growth rate will not lie.
whether in China or the United States, 60% of sugar is used for industrial consumption, of which 90% is used for beverages, cans, quick-frozen rice noodles and other products.
in the past, the growth of sugar demand was mainly driven by sugary drinks.
and this part of the market is also the main market of sugar substitutes.
sugar substitutes and sugars are indeed at the moment of confrontation. For sugared beverage manufacturers, the more frightening point is that there is too much room for the growth of sugar free drinks in Japan.
the market is so big, you die, I live.
to put it bluntly, this is butt war.
as mentioned earlier, there are also a lot of good and bad products in sugar substitutes, which have to be rolled up.
Full text reference sources are as follows:
【1】. [Dongxing securities] “sugar free” series report (II): the rise of sugar substitutes
【2】. Cathrina H. Edwards, Megan Rossi, Christopher P. Corpe, Peter J. Butterworth, Peter R. Ellis, The role of sugars and sweeteners in food, diet and health: Alternatives for the future,Trends in Food Science & Technology,Volume 56,2016,Pages 158-166, ISSN 0924-2244,
【3】. Zhang Jiaxin, suitable for sugar substitutes or increasing the risk of cancer, science and technology daily, March 30, 2022, version 004
【4】. Eloi Chazelas, Charlotte Debras, Bernard Srour, Léopold K. Fezeu, Chantal Julia, Serge Hercberg, Mélanie Deschasaux, Mathilde Touvier, Sugary Drinks, Artificially-Sweetened Beverages, and Cardiovascular Disease in the NutriNet-Santé Cohort, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Volume 76, Issue 18,2020,Pages 2175-2177,ISSN 0735-1097,
【5】. Zhao Shuqin, Bao Zhongjian, Jiang Xin, et al Research Progress on Biosafety of artificial sweetener sucralose [J] Chinese Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018, 34 (22): 3
【6】. ABOU DONIA M B， EI MASＲY E M， ABDEL ＲAHMAN A A， et al. Splenda alters gut microflora and increases intestinal P－glycoprotein and cytochrome P － 450 in male rats［J］. J Toxicol Environ Health A， 2008， 71( 21) : 1415 － 1429.
【7】. SASAKI Y F， KAWAGUCHI S， KAMAYA A， et al. The comet assay with 8 mouse organs: Ｒesults with 39 currently used food additives［J］ . Mutation Ｒesearch，2002，519( 1－2) : 103－119
【8】. Djésia Arnone, Caroline Chabot, Anne-Charlotte Heba, Tunay Kökten,Bénédicte Caron, Franck Hansmannel, Natacha Dreumont, Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, Didier Quilliot, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Sugars and Gastrointestinal Health, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology,2021,,ISSN 1542-3565,
【9】. Michael D. Kendig, Kyoko Hasebe, Róisín McCague, Frances Lee, Sarah-Jane Leigh, Ria Arnold, Margaret J. Morris, Adolescent exposure to a solid high-fat, high-sugar ‘cafeteria’ diet leads to more pronounced changes in metabolic measures and gut microbiome composition than liquid sugar in female rats,Appetite, Volume 172,2022,105973, ISSN 0195-6663,
【10】. World Health Organization. (2015). Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. World Health Organization
【11】. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. (2019). Ending inappropriate promotion of commercially available complementary foods for infants and young children between 6 and 36 months in Europe: a discussion paper outlining the first steps in developing a nutrient profile model to drive changes to product composition and labelling and promotion practices in the WHO European Region. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
【12】. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. (2021). Expert meeting on improving drinking-water consumption for decreasing the intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and reducing plastic waste: meeting report, 27-28 February 2020, Moscow, Russian Federation. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
【13】. Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents. JAMA Internal Medicine,2016,176 (11):1680
【14】. Sugar industry sponsorship of germ-free rodent studies linking sucrose to hyperlipidemia and cancer: An historical analysis of internal documents[J]. PLoS biology, 2017, 15(11): e2003460.
【15】. [Ipsos] Study on consumers’ sugar reduction behavior and attitude
【16】. [Research on the upgrading trend of Huaxia Securities Industry: Baifang chemical industry
【17】. [Northeast Securities] C Sanyuan (301206): erythritol is the global overlord and the invisible champion in the 0 sugar era
【18】. Palinthorn Nagsuwanchart, Siriruk Nakornchai, Sroisiri Thaweboon, Rudee Surarit,Mogroside, palatinose, erythritol, and xylitol differentially affect dental plaque pH in caries-active and caries-free children: An in vitro study,Pediatric Dental Journal,Volume 31, Issue 3,2021,Pages 242-247,ISSN 0917-2394,
【19】. Riina Runnel, Kauko K. Mäkinen, Sisko Honkala, Jana Olak, Pirkko-Liisa Mäkinen, Rita Nõmmela, Tero Vahlberg, Eino Honkala, Mare Saag, Effect of three-year consumption of erythritol, xylitol and sorbitol candies on various plaque and salivary caries-related variables,Journal of Dentistry,Volume 41, Issue 12,2013,Pages 1236-1244,ISSN 0300-5712,
Read the original text